AIG, Silas Marner, and a misdirected rage

George Eliot’s “Silas Marner: The Weaver of Raveloe” was published during the Industrial Revolution in England. It tells a tale of virtue, the rewards of hard work, and the inevitable and eventual punishment of evil against your neighbor.
rAIGe

Silas Marner, expressing his rage.

Dunstan Cass is the selfish, deceitful, and corrupt villain in this classic story, and his family is the wealth and government of the city. When his spineless brother Godfrey gets drunk, Dunstan convinces Godfrey to give him money intended for rent. When Godfrey sobers, he demands payment from Dunstan in order to pay his own bills. Unable to return the squandered money, Dunstan convinces him to sell his horse to raise the necessary funds. After the horse is sold, but before it is delivered, Dunstan subsequently kills it during a hunt. Undiscovered in this atrocity, Dunstan burgles the title character’s home, steals his hard-earned fortune, and seemingly gets away with it (he is found dead at the bottom of a well sixteen years later along with the gold he stole).

 

 

Today, President Obama, congress, and the populace publicly cast their outrage at AIG, the multinational insurance corporation of whom the government owns eighty percent. Newswires, bloggers, and commentators went berserk at the revelation of AIG’s disbursement of bonuses to executives, which totaled nearly $165 million. Employees received threats from private citizens and the company had to post armed guards at their headquarters to keep peace. Republican Senator Chuck Grassley even expressed his desire that AIG executives “resign or go commit suicide.” President Obama asked, “How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?”

(more…)

Fiscalism is a Hate Crime

As a taxpayer and consumer from corporations who get their money from large conglomerate banks such as Citigroup, I feel I am entitled to a bailout.

 

After all, how can I continue buying from corporations who are getting their loans from large conglomerate banks if I am only paying more in taxes to save the conglomerate banks who provide the loans to the corporations?

 

Or how can I buy from the Small Businesses who purchase their goods from corporations who get loans from large conglomerate banks if they go out of business because of having to pay more in taxes in order to bail out those large conglomerate banks who provide loans to corporations?

 

Or how can I purchase an automobile from the rescued automobile corporations who get their loans from large conglomerate banks who have been bailed out if my money is already going toward bailing out those automobile corporations who get their loans from large conglomerate banks.

 

Or why should I be discriminated against just because I lived within my means, did not take any unnecessary risks, and did not count on the economic bubble to be infinitely elastic. In fact, I should be rewarded for my fiscal conservatism by a government bailout. This is a clear human rights violation against us frugalists. Fiscalism should be a hate crime. The government should be willing to protect all facets of fiscal diversity, not just those who chose to destroy their own companies.

 

By the way, that is sardonic irony…

Tagged with: