What People Like About Health Care–Rasmussen

Rasmussen recently posted their findings in a survey on the current health care reform bills in Congress. Surprisingly, many respondents favored the creation of a national insurance exchange and requiring insurance companies to accept applicants with preexisting  conditions.

As with all polls, the timbre, syntax, inflection, and word choice greatly influences the outcome of the responses–although Rasmussen tries to eliminate this factor as much as they can. Nevertheless, one can’t help but wonder, what if the questions were asked differently? (Proposed Changes are in Red)

//

1* Regardless of what they think of the overall plan, many people have different opinions on individual reform proposals. I am going to read you a list of items included in the proposed health care legislation. For each please let me know if you Strongly Favor, Somewhat Favor, Somewhat Oppose, or Strongly Oppose that proposal.

Okay, the plans before Congress would prohibit people from choosing insurance plans with lower premiums and higher deductibles.

The plans before Congress reduce an individual’s choices in regards to lower premiums and higher deductibles.

8% Strongly favor
16% Somewhat favor
19% Somewhat oppose
45% Strongly oppose
11% Not sure

2* The plan would require nearly all employers to provide health insurance for their employees or pay a penalty.

The plan requires employers to spend more money that could be paid in salary in order to comply with a federal regulation that demands they instead provide an insurance package that will invariably be chosen on the basis of cost to the company…

36% Strongly favor
15% Somewhat favor
12% Somewhat oppose
35% Strongly oppose
2% Not sure

3* The plan would provide subsidies to help low-income people buy health insurance and expand Medicaid to help the poorest get insurance.

The plan takes tax dollars and distributes them to people of the government’s choosing. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Obama’s Governmental Philanthropy

Let’s face it. President Obama has a remarkable amount of trust in the American people; people in general, for that matter. And the feeling is reciprocal. His campaign platform of “Hope” and “Change” brought an emotional enthusiasm from his supporters passionately yearning for everything he promised. Millions of Americans voted for him expecting him to new era of transparency, responsibility, and a governmental metamorphosis. The international community hailed his ascension as the World’s Citizen, and his promise to restore America to its global good-standing. His ability to connect equally with a foreign head of state and the common American alike is indeed a remarkable feat worthy of some adulation—at face value, anyway.

 

In theory, his rhetorical abilities and global popularity would enable him to fulfill what he promised—to change the world. In all practicality, however, he will fall short of the magnific expectations he and his supporters have set. The reason for this is simple: governmental altruism does not work and his entire economic philosophy is based on it.

(more…)

Tagged with: