As a taxpayer and consumer from corporations who get their money from large conglomerate banks such as Citigroup, I feel I am entitled to a bailout.

After all, how can I continue buying from corporations who are getting their loans from large conglomerate banks if I am only paying more in taxes to save the conglomerate banks who provide the loans to the corporations?

Or how can I buy from the Small Businesses who purchase their goods from corporations who get loans from large conglomerate banks if they go out of business because of having to pay more in taxes in order to bail out those large conglomerate banks who provide loans to corporations?

Or how can I purchase an automobile from the rescued automobile corporations who get their loans from large conglomerate banks who have been bailed out if my money is already going toward bailing out those automobile corporations who get their loans from large conglomerate banks.

Or why should I be discriminated against just because I lived within my means, did not take any unnecessary risks, and did not count on the economic bubble to be infinitely elastic. In fact, I should be rewarded for my fiscal conservatism by a government bailout. This is a clear human rights violation against us frugalists. Fiscalism should be a hate crime. The government should be willing to protect all facets of fiscal diversity, not just those who chose to destroy their own companies.

By the way, that is sardonic irony…